|
Lead story:
A False Sense of Security Permeates the Business
World:
Here are its 8 Leading Causes
Top headlines:
1. Kama Sutra Worm Set to Strike Windows Machines on Feb
3rd
2. ChoicePoint Fined $15 Million
for Losing 163,000 Private
Records
3. New Site Helps Users
Research and Report Undesirable Software
4. Best
Reason Yet To Use Google
5. Zero-day Exploit Embarrasses
Microsoft
6. ID Theft Leads FTC List of
Consumer Complaints
7. Consumers Find Cybercrime 3 Times More Likely
Than Physical Crime
8. Ontario Court Dismisses Case After Plaintiff Hacks Into
Server
9. Australian Police Apologise After Sending Child Porn To
Schools
10. Two New Must-Have
Services for Small and Mid-Size
Businesses
11.
Microsoft Makes Internet Explorer 7 Available To the
Public
Lead story:
A False Sense of Security Permeates the Business World.
Here are its 8 Leading Causes
According to a report released by Symantec last week, the
average laptop contains a whopping $1M worth of information. The AVERAGE
laptop. Some executive notebooks are valued as high as $US8.8 million
based on the client data, intellectual property and confidential
information they contain. The news comes about 10 years after the
industry noted that laptops are the most valuable target of corporate
theft. Today, according to the recent FBI
computer crime survey, 50% of organizations reported the theft of
laptops in 2005.
All theft aside, according to Silicon.com, in the UK as
many as 10,000 laptops are simply lost or forgotten in public places
each year. That adds up to a lot of valuable data. In the US, according
to the FBI study, 2.8million organizations experienced losses totaling
$67.2 million as a result of security incidents. That number was found
to be 3 to 4 times HIGHER than in previous years.
According to SecurityFocus: "Among the [FBI Study]
findings, nearly nine out of ten organizations experienced security
incidents in the past year. Over 64% of respondents incurred a financial
loss as a result of computer crime - yet only 9% reported these
incidents to law enforcement. The United States and China top of the
list as by far the worst offenders, together accounting as the source of
more than half of all external intrusion attempts. However, not
surprisingly the survey also reports that 44% of all reported intrusions
were sourced as internal to the organization affected."
Although we can assume that researchers are getting better
at quantifying losses and calculating the impact of security incidents,
it is clear that after decades of Internet use, e-business
innovation and progress, organizations are still way behind in
terms of security preparedness and respect for the vast problems
that define information asset protection.
To be clear, the only thing that we should take away from
the statistic that 9 out of 10 companies have experienced a breach is
the fact that 1 out of 10 hasn't bothered to find or report its security
breaches. The biggest issue is the fact that the same breaches are
occurring year after year, with the simplest and most expensive ones
leading the pack.
According to my rough calculation, 30 large companies made
the Wall of Shame last year. 30 that should have known better because
they pretend to be the consumer's best friend, keeping our private
data and trading it for cash. According to the Privacy Rights
Clearinghouse, these affected millions of people. Here are the top 10
offenders:
-
CardSystems Solutions 40 million consumer
accounts
-
Citigroup 3.9 million consumer accounts
-
DSW Shoe Warehouse 1.4 million ...
-
Bank of America 1.2 million ...
-
Time Warner 600,000 ...
-
LexisNexis 310,000
-
Ameritrade 200,000
-
Polo Ralph Lauren 180,000
-
ChoicePoint 145,000
-
Boston College 120,000
Don't be impressed by the big numbers. They're important,
but they don't tell the whole story. A closer look at the facts tells us
that most of these security breaches were not caused by high-tech whiz
kids (those probably go undetected). No, these failures occurred because
of simple things like lost backup tapes, stolen passwords,
smash&grab robberies and in the case of Citibank, the tapes were
simply lost in the mail.
Granted, DSW Shoe Warehouse, Polo Ralph Lauren and
LexisNexis did manage to get hit hard by by hackers, but that's just the
problem, coverage has been inconsistent or non-existent either because
the general media, the ones who have all the eyeballs, have no idea
how to represent the magnitude of the problem to the average reader
without covering the story in the "Oddly Enough" column or risking it
seem as if the sky was falling.
Perhaps that's why 75% of all new prospects that I meet
have developed a well-rehearsed mantra: "We have no security problems,
everything's taken care of". That same group is later forced to
react to security breaches instead of preventing them, a much more
expensive and less effective proposition.
Aside from uninformed people working with incomplete
data in an attempt to bring us pre-digested news while
carefully avoiding apocalyptic scenarios, what else do you believe is
the cause of this blatantly false sense of security? Here are my
other 7 contenders:
1. Coasting on
momentum - it's not just about apathy and ignorance, or is it? Is
past performance an indicator of future security? Not in this business!
What we don't know can't hurt us, but what about the aforementioned
infamous 30 organizations? They had all the money in the world, they
just lacked the budgets. And so it goes for the other 75% of
international (mostly small and mid-size) companies that felt the sting
of security inadequacy last year.
2. Security
suites - are you seeing all-in-one security products flying
off the shelves? Let them. Your security protection - whether on a home
system or an enterprise network - should be made up of specialized
layers, of best-of-breed tools, not one big bloated magic pill. Note,
the latter is different from the concept of centralized
security management, an often effective strategy for increasing
visibility and control across the enterprise.
3. Automated,
online security tools - have you come across e-commerce Web
sites that proudly proclaim that they are "hacker-free"
"security-protected", "impermeable to breaches" or otherwise
invulnerable based on the fact that they are 'checked daily' by an
automated scan? Rest assured, hackers couldn't care less about such
claims and the only thing that it should mean to you when presented with
the typical 'shield' logo, is that the company in question is deluded
about their own level of protection.
4. Computer
vendors and retail stores - why does out-of-the-box
ease-of-use plug-and-play have to mean "bogged down with obsolete demo
versions of software that are a pain to remove"? Computer stores and
vendors are now basing all their marketing on how quickly you can be
'online' once you've stepped away from the cash register. What people
should be asking is how much time do I have before my new
computer gets infected . The answer? about 20 minutes.
5. Security
vendors - why is it that every time a new security product is
introduced, it paints such a rosy picture of the world that you
literally feel like you will never have another care in the world.
Alternatively, it makes such a huge deal out of threats that you didn't
know existed that you're either compelled to ignore it, or get a
trial copy (just in case) and never end up using it (probably because it
interferes with every other security tool you have).
6. Telcos and
ISPs - ah the telecommunications industry. When it
works, it's a cash cow. Millions of homes and
businesses providing reliable, monthly cash
flow earmarked for expansion and diversification. Due to roughly
gazillions of complaints from Internet subscribers, companies have
finally found a way to provide solutions they can actually profit from,
while fitting neatly into their guaranteed monthly revenue
model. From subscription-based software firewall service to monthly
virus/spyware protection, it's all available in byte-sized chunks.
Unfortunately, its relative value is measured in crumbs. Convenience and
security don't always go together.
7. Oblivious and
desensitized IT managers - the least guilty people of
the lot. They were hired to make sure systems and networks support
business functions, then were told that not only are they
responsible for 'security around here' but also for every single network
user's infected PC, the company's security and privacy compliance and
all the new threats that crop up on a daily basis. Can you really blame
them for saying "nah, we're fine. Security is completely under control
here". Unfortunately top level management most often believes them and
fails to create a mature, actionable security plan that would minimize
the damage from incidents occur.
Agree? Disagree? Am I completely off base? Why did I stop at 8? Why
am I letting Microsoft off the hook? How do Chinese hackers fit
into my equation? Ask away. Write back and let me know.
Claudiu
Popa, (Claudiu@InformaticaSecurity.com)
Your humble scribe
PRE-PROCESSED
HEADLINES
Kama Sutra worm set
to strike Windows machines on Feb 3rd
Windows users are being urged to make sure their
systems are clean from an email worm that promises recipients images of
the Kama Sutra. It is in fact designed to hide on user systems
and programmed to overwrite user files (DOC, XLS, MDB, MDE, PPT, PPS,
ZIP, RAR, PDF, PSD and DMP files) on February 3rd. Blackworm (also
called Nyxem, MyWife or Tearec) has infected more than 300,000
systems worldwide. Here are its propagation
statistics.
According to the Register, if activated,
Blackworm tries to disable security software. It also tries to harvest
email addresses from infected PCs in a routine designed to draw up a hit
list of targets for infection. Blackworm is programmed to download
updates of its code onto infected PCs. Whether it will have any success is another matter, as
most anti-virus vendors have already included its unique signature in
their detection engines.
ChoicePoint Fined
$15 Million for Losing Private Data of 163,000 Individuals
Data broker ChoicePoint was fined $15m last week
over a data security breach that led to at least 800 cases of identity
theft out of the entire set of 163,000 that they managed to lose to
hackers in one of 2005's most spectacular cybertheft cases.
ChoicePoint agreed to pay $10m in civil penalties (a record fine) and
$5m to compensate consumers as part of a settlement with US consumer
watchdog the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). It also agreed to maintain
a revamped security program, featuring regular third-party security
audits until 2026, and promised to ensure it provides consumer reports
only to legitimate businesses for lawful purposes. ChoicePoint competitor Equifax has twice been similarly
breached in the past couple of years, but has to date managed
to escape serious repercussions.
New
Site Helps Users Research and Report Undesirable Software
StopBadware.org, launched
last week by the Harvard University's Berkman Centre and the Oxford
Internet Institute, aims to establish a neighborhood watch-style scheme
that will put pressure on purveyors of unsavoury programs that snoop
on consumer's net habits.
The project has created
a website, http://www.stopbadware.org/, where
net users can check to see if programs they encounter are potentially
damaging or benign. StopBadware.org hopes to educate consumers and
software developers as well as shining a light on firms that make
millions using sneaky pop-ups and tracking software to spy on users'
surfing habits or, in the worst cases, steal their personal information,
such as credit card or Social Security numbers.
Best Reason Yet To Use Google
According to the Associated
Press, the search giant has refused to comply with a White House subpoena
first issued last summer, prompting U.S. Attorney General Alberto
Gonzales this week to ask a federal judge in San Jose for an order
to force a handover of the requested records.
The aforementioned Bush
minion wants a list of all requests entered into Google's search engine
during an unspecified single week ? a breakdown that could conceivably
span tens of millions of queries. In addition, it seeks 1 million
randomly selected Web addresses from various Google databases. Google
competitor Yahoo Inc. confirmed that it had already complied with
the weasel's subpoena. Yahoo stressed that it didn't reveal any personal
information. "We are rigorous defenders of our users' privacy," Yahoo
spokeswoman Mary Osako said Thursday. "In our opinion, this is not
a privacy issue."
Obtaining the subpoenaed
information from Google "would assist the government in its efforts
to understand the behavior of current Web users, (and) to estimate
how often Web users encounter harmful-to-minors material in the course
of their searches," the Justice Department wrote in a brief filed
last Wednesday. The stand-off continues. I'll keep you posted.
Zero-day Exploit Embarrasses Microsoft
For four days in January, network administrators and security-savvy
home users had a choice: download and install an unofficial open-source
fix for the critical flaw in the Windows Meta File (WMF) format, or
wait an estimated week for an official patch from Microsoft.
Microsoft was under such pressure to test and release the patch on
January 10th that a work-in-progress version of the fix was accidentally
leaked to security sites. The issue was so serious that Microsoft
ended up publishing the code before its notoriously rigid release
date, even after stating that they would make no exceptions to
their patch schedule.
To be fair, with each patch cycle, the company must test
its patches to work on multiple Windows OSes and in 23 languages.
"The expedited track to investigate the vulnerability and develop
the security update includes redirecting resources from other security
development and testing efforts to primarily focus around the clock
on producing and releasing the security update," wrote a representative.
ID
Theft Leads FTC List of Consumer Complaints
As it turns out, consumers don't enjoy being
duped. Last week the Federal Trade Commission released its annual report
detailing consumer complaints about fraud and identity theft in 2005.
Complaints about identity theft topped the list, accounting for 255,000
(37%) of more than 686,000 total complaints
filed with the agency in 2005.
Findings from the report include:
- Internet-related complaints accounted for 46 percent of all fraud
complaints.
- The percent of Internet-related fraud complaints with ?wire
transfer? as the reported payment method more than tripled between
2003 and 2005.
- The major metropolitan areas with the highest per capita rates of
consumer fraud reported were Washington, DC; Tampa/St.
Petersburg/Clearwater, FL; and Seattle, WA.
- Credit card fraud was the most common form of reported identity
theft, followed by phone or utilities fraud, bank fraud, and
employment fraud.
- The most frequently reported type of identity theft bank fraud was
electronic funds transfers.
- The major metropolitan areas with the highest per capita rates of
reported identity theft were Phoenix/Mesa/Scottsdale, AZ; Las
Vegas/Paradise, NV; and Riverside/San Bernardino/Ontario,
CA.
Survey: Consumers Think Cybercrime 3 Times More Likely
Than Phycical Crime
More Americans anticipate falling victim to a cyber attack rather
than a physical crime, reports a recent IBM survey of U.S. adults.
And, despite the convenience and flexibility that online transactions
offer, 37 percent of Americans will not provide credit card information
online. Surveying almost 700 participants that have Internet access at work
or home, IBM reveals that, in the next twelve months, more than three
times the number of respondents think it is more likely they will
be the victim of a cybercrime (ie, attacked through networked devices
such as computers, ATMs, obile phones, PDAs, etc.) than a physical
crime. Consumers are reportedly changing their own behavior to
protect themselves against cyber attack:
- 85 percent destroy all documents that have personal information or
they attempt to securely store the information
- 70 percent only use Internet shopping sites that display a
security protection seal
- 64 percent don't conduct online transactions on a shared computer
- 50 percent don't use shared wireless networks such as in a coffee
shop or airport
- 38 percent don't bank online
- 37 percent don't use credit card information online
In the last 12 months, survey respondents have taken certain actions
to protect themselves against the growing cybercrime threat:
- 29% have stopped reading credit or debit card information over the
phone
- 27% have stopped buying from unfamiliar retailers
- 18% have stopped paying bills online
- 16% have stopped playing online games
Ontario Court
Dismisses Case After Plaintiff Hacks Into Server
According to ITBusiness.ca, a Superior Court
judge has dismissed a lawsuit after the plaintiff hacked into the
defendant?s computer server while legal proceedings were taking
place. The plaintiff secretly accessed and downloaded the
entire contents of the defendant?s server, including privileged
communications between the defendant and his solicitors, as well as data
unrelated to the lawsuit. click
here to read the whole article
Australian Police Apologise For Sending Child Porn
To Schools
I know, it's unfair to drag the past out into the
light, but from the Bonehead archives comes this story, dating back to
November 2004. Australian police apologized profusely after
inadvertently sending Internet images of child pornography to 1,800
schools ... while trying to warn principals about children at risk of
abuse.
The mistake came during a massive, 400-raid
police crackdown on child pornography that had resulted in more than 200
arrests, including police, teachers, clergy and the owner of a
child-care centre.
Two New Types
of Security Audit Address Website, Small Business Threats
Small and Mid-size enterprises (SME) account for
over 75% of companies and just as high a percentage of security
breaches, yet the attention is always on the big names. Unfortunately
many of these smaller firms suffer in silence, sometimes reporting
breaches, sometimes covering them up.
As a result of very specific client requests, Informatica (yes, this
company) has introduced two new securiy assessments designed to detect
and address SME security vulnerabilities, preferably before they cause
public embarrassment, costly lawsuits or loss of business.
- The first is FlexSecure
WebVerify, delivering a complete analysis and report of the
security posture of Web sites or online applications. This is a high
growth areas as more than 100 new Web-related vulnerabilities are
introduced each month.
- The second is FlexSecure
SnapShot, a terrific expert review of business processes and
operations that produces a comprehensive view of a company's security
readiness, from the way it manages site visitors, to its employee
policy enforcement. Click the above links for more information, and
let your business contacts know about them (or join our Partner
Program to do some good).
New Internet Explorer 7 Offers New Security and
Privacy Features
Microsoft has recently made available their new Internet
Explorer 7 browser for free download to users of Windows XP. It is
not the final, fully tested product, but a beta release that is mostly
stable and introduces a whole new set of security and privacy features.
Among them, a variety of basic safeguards against phishing, information
theft and spyware, including better protection settings enabled by
default. For a full description of security features, click
here.
Main Site | White Papers |
Free
Software | News & Articles
| Forward to a Friend
| About
your humble scribe:
Claudiu
Popa is a certified security
professional (CISSP, PMP, CISA) and president of Informatica Corporation,
a Toronto-based consulting company with a strong focus
on education. Over
the past decade, Claudiu has focused on helping companies
improve their information
security. Today, he brings effective security to corporate
boardrooms, helping organizations manage security, awareness and
compliance programs. Claudiu can be contacted by simply replying
to this message (and he promises not to respond in the third
person). He welcomes your suggestions and
comments regarding this publication.
|

|
About
the Company:
At
a governance level, Informatica Corporation is a Canadian security
firm with unmatched expertise in regulatory compliance, information
risk management and corporate education. At a lower, more technical
level, a diverse, high profile clientele trusts Informatica to
secure Web sites, applications and workplaces. At every layer,
Informatica protects information security and data confidentiality.
Visit us at http://www.informationsecuritycanada.com/
use this
link to subscribe. |